Pixelprotector Bluray

Inquinamento Intenzionale Integrato.

Hello World! The excellent Blog: freeskies.over-blog.com. I suggest this interesting post, which talks about the issues involved in blue sky.
The picture is quite disturbing, but there is a solution that we can "everything" to put in place ... as long as we want it and give us a good wake volta.O want to end up destroying our planet? Up to you Decision finale.Se do not do something "NOW" ... after it will be too tardi.Spegniamo television and go out from the dream that we have imposed! Namastè to tutti.Skywatcher.

Monday, September 20, 2010 1 20 / 09 / 2010 10:08

Intentional Integrated Pollution

To date, the hypothesis that chemtrails are a useful carrier for a process of transformation silenziosa del nostro pianeta, sembra essere l’ipotesi più plausibile. Ci sono molti indizi su come sia stata orchestrata un’operazione di rimodellazione della vita sulla Terra che mira a riconfigurare l’ecosistema tutto per renderlo qualcosa di profondamente diverso da come lo conoscevamo. Questa colossale operazione di rimodellazione o terraformazione (1) utilizza molti strumenti per la sua riuscita: l’ingegneria genetica, le emissioni di onde elettromagnetiche, l’inquinamento bio-chimico, le nanotecnologie, la gestione delle risorse, la comunicazione. Il fattore che più ci ha sorpreso è stato quello dell’utilizzazione sistematica dei media: il cinema, la musica, la televisione, la moda, la letteratura but also the architecture and urban design, are the preferred means of conveyance of instances of striking for their novelty and the ultimate meaning of the messages that underlie below a thin cover more and more symbolic in view, we imagine, a Full and peremptory epiphany. This bombardment of communication elements permeating, in addition to a compelling purpose and a distraction, even an obvious end evocative (2).



The deal does not seem to leave anything to chance, and proceeds with a program of synchronized events in the various sectors of public life, which tend to the establishment of an authoritarian regime with paramilitary task of population control e delle risorse che però non va confuso con il fine ultimo di queste azioni. Contemporaneamente, tutti gli ambiti della nostra vita spirituale e materiale sono pervasi dall’inquinamento sistematico effettuato tramite il rilascio di mezzi vettore finalizzati ad operare la trasformazione nella sfera vitale terrestre. Il fatto che l’operazione abbia bisogno dell’appoggio sistematico delle armi di persuasione più o meno occulta ci lascia paradossalmente un filo di speranza. Evidentemente è temuta, da coloro che compiono questa azione e dai loro mandanti, una qual forma di resistenza che cercano quindi di ridurre al minimo con tecniche di coercizione mentale più o meno invasive. Dobbiamo ammettere che gran parte dell’umanità non è only prepared to accept this change, but even so wishes! Other humans, even worried, but they feel protected by a filter of our own historical and cultural species, unaware of the small cover that allows it. Our history (including the thought) is very little in the face of such a connection and in fact most do not even seem to notice the 'firepower' to which we are subjected.



The propaganda machine works at full speed: GMOs (3), for example, were presented in principle as the solution to the problem of hunger in the world (remember?) And chemtrails were often associated with operations aimed at mitigating the so-called cambiamento climatico (geoingegneria) in una operazione di condizionamento mentale tanto subdola quanto efficace. Sappiamo bene quale sia il fine delle coltivazioni OGM così come dubitiamo sulle reali intenzioni di chi irrora i cieli (ed i corpi) con mix chimici-organici.



Resta da chiarire l’annoso problema: chi è quell’umano che non riesce a rendersi conto che sta contribuendo ad affondare la barca su cui egli stesso naviga? Le ipotesi che rimangono sono tre: o l’umano in questione non naviga sulla stessa barca in cui navighiamo tutti (possiede un’arca di Noè?) o ha deciso comunque di suicidarsi oppure è un essere “anfibio” e cioè è pronto a prosperare nel nuovo reshaped the world. Yes, because this process of remodeling is irreversible, nothing will ever be: the exceptional biodiversity of the planet has created thousands of years of natural history and may not be reproduced in the laboratory as soon as possible!

The small slice of humanity that he has noticed the problem so that the duties relate to its sphere of ethics: it must continue to seek and disseminate the results of his research. It must also oppose this change adversely affecting the foundations of its intimate nature. Many humans have been seduced to accept this change, with promises of a long and serene life in an environment filled with artificial stimuli. We know that science and technology have been used against ourselves in ways difficult to understand: they are areas of exclusive prerogative of the ruling elite that address the billions allocated in those areas in a completely top-down, well away from social control.



our word and our rights are nothing compared to the pressure exerted by this operation, but a way to curb all there and is related to the power of our spiritual sphere: a sphere of which we still know but that is obviously very much feared by the framers of such changes. Our deep opposition to the proposed new system could be implemented to prevent such a scenario. Maybe "they" need some form of appeasement and call on our part and this could explain the "hunt" that applied against those who have 'charisma', a quality considered to be very important. More our quality much feared altruistic concern our sphere: love, generosity, dedication, mutual support, empathy, and maybe it's appropriate to get to work in this sense, no? However, the events go, we would not feel to have wasted our time. That everyone let him: perhaps this is why we are now six billion and half people! Let us act now. What is the model proposed by them to us? E 'that of a man isolated, cold, sterile, aggressive instincts and satisfied in his demeaning. It 'a being-directed, a' teletabisica '(Teletubbies), which obeys the pulse of radio waves and living, in a natural-looking plastic, a life insane preprogrammed as accurate as depressing. A world in which God only child (again) marks the hours of day and where the high repeater stations hypnotic pulse, peremptorily induce obedience. And do not think that their world is only the fruit of the creative writer!



(1) http://www.tankerenemy.com/2010/09/terraforming-creare-un-pianeta.html

(2) http://santaruina.splinder.com/post/22939962/pensiero-magico-ed-evocazione

(3) http://www.rfb.it/csa/links/ogm . htm

Pilates Do People Wear Socks

SIGNED! SIGN! SIGN! ... And Let's stop it!

Hello people! again with a new post, which you can resume very well the last of August 30 last year, where I talked about GMOs (genetically modified organisms). ... Now you can change something that is already perfect her? I think no.La Nature took thousands of years to reach the perfection of its Ecosistema.E we doing? stupid as we are, and no longer able to live a "NATURAL" as all other beings that populate our planet Mother, modify them! Now ... ask yourself ... Who benefits from this? To us poor human beings at the mercy of unscrupulous corporations, research institutes fed to the sound of millions in subsidies from the latter, the corrupt politicians who for a handful of U.S. dollar also sell his own mother, of bankers that we are only cattle squeeze, or mainly benefits a few people who want to gain on our food, passing over as compressors to our lives, our rights, safety, our needs to live in this world as best we can? Well ... I do not know how you think, but I warmly invite you to reflect on what is happening in Europe regarding GM crops . Think especially to your children, your children and the future that is prepared if we do something.
two days ago I received an email from a member of our association BLUE SKIES, which came true to me about what the European Commission is preparing on GMO crops , in Europe until recently has always been a carryover contraria.Ve verbatim, so you can capire.E I invite you to stop this diabolical plan that is being deployed by politicians who do not know that we did not vote and that there is minimal information on what fare.Sono few people who want to decide sulla totalità degli abitanti Europei,(500.000.000. forse anche di più...).Leggete,informatevi e diffondete!Namastè a tutti.Skywatcher.



Quasi 1 milione contro gli OGM!


La Commissione Europea ha appena approvato la coltivazione di OGM in Europa, ignorando le preoccupazioni dell'opinione pubblica. Ho firmato una petizione per una riccerca indipendente ed una moratoria sullo sviluppo dei raccolti OGM. Con un milione di firme dei cittadini, possiamo fare una richiesta ufficiale e legale alla Commissione Europea. Firma in basso e raggiungiamo un milione di firme:

http://www.avaaz.org/it/eu_gmo/?cl=745238965&v=7146

Thanks!

------

Dear friends,

the European Commission has recently approved the cultivation of GM crops in the EU for the first time in 12 years!

collapsed in the face to the lobby of GMOs, the Committee has ignored 60% of Europeans who feel they must assess the facts before you grow food that may pose a threat to our health and the environment.

A new initiative to allow a million citizens and legal officials to make requests to the European Commission. Let us raise a million voices for the banning of GM food until it is completed, the research will be delivered to the Commission President European Barroso. Sign the petition and forward this e-mail to friends and family:

http://www.avaaz.org/it/eu_gmo/?cl=745238965&v=7146

Consumer groups, public health , environmentalists and farmers have long protested against a small group of international companies in favor of GMOs that have a significant influence on European agriculture. Concerns about GM crops include: contamination of organic crops and the environment and their impact on climate because of the excessive use of pesticides applied, the distriuzione biodiversity and local agriculture, and the effects of GM foods on public health .

La decisione dell'Unione Europea di autorizzare la coltivazione della patata della BASF e del mais della Monsanto ha trovato la dura opposizione del ministero dell'agricoltura italiano, che ha dichiarato di volere "difendere e slavaguardare l'agricoltura tradizionale e la salute dei cittadini".

Non c'è ancora consenso sugli effetti a lungo termine dei raccolti OGM. Ed è l'industria OGM, che ricerca i profitti non il bene pubblico, che sta finanziando la scienza e guidando l'ambiente regolatore. Ecco perché i cittadini europei stanno richiedendo una ricerca più indipendente, esperimenti e precauzione prima che i raccolti vengano permessi nella nostra terra.

Adesso, l'"Iniziativa dei Cittadini Europei" dà the opportunity to one million European citizens to present policy proposals to the European Commission and offers us a unique opportunity to undermine the influence of the lobby.

We raise a million voices to put a moratorium on the introduction of GM crops in Europe and create an ethical and independent scientific body to conduct research and establish a strong regulation of GM crops. Sign the petition now and then forward it widely:

http://www.avaaz.org/it/eu_gmo/?cl=745238965&v=7146

With determination,

Alice, Benjamin, Ricken, Luis, Graziela and the whole Avaaz team.

More information:

Eurobarometer Report 2008 on 'attitude of European citizens towards the environment "(English), page 66:
http://bit.ly/aMkeVJ

Europe says yes to" superpatate ", Time:
http://iltempo.ilsole24ore.com/interni_esteri/2010/03/03/1133194-europa_dice_alle_superpatate.shtml

GM: The whole of Italy (or almost) against the transgenic potato, ASCA:
http:// bit.ly / bbJUyA

Basf without brakes, two other GM in 2010, Earth:
http://www.terranews.it/news/2010/03/basf-senza-freni-altri-due-ogm -within-the-2010

Greenpeace and the ISAAA report: "The miracle is over GM in a tumble," Greenreport:
http://www.greenreport.it/_new/index.php?page=default&id=3633&cat=Consumi


CLICK THIS LINK FOR SIGN:
http://www.avaaz.org/it/eu_gmo/?cl=745238965&v=7146

Solo Dancong Coustomes

One question: but Europe is inhabited by masochist? ... Video-Alex




Hello people! maybe you're wondering because of the title of post.Bene reading the latest article from the website: http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/index.php talking about GMOs (genetically modified organisms), Monsanto, pesticides and Europe, well! ... I said that we Europeans (those who govern us, of course), maybe we're a little if at all masochisti.Vi carry the full article so you can understand what I mean dire.Spero will face "a little" thinking, and that makes you accountable for what they have in the program (always those who govern us ...) for us in the next anni.Decisamente insane (in my view). Happy reading! Namastè to tutti.Skywatcher.

Genetically modified crops: THE COLLAPSE OF THE U.S. GMO



A LESSON FOR THE WORLD OF

F. William Engdahl Global Research


Recently, the rulers non eletti della Commissione Europea, noti per essersi sempre opposti alla diffusione di organismi geneticamente modificati (OGM) nell'agricoltura dell'UE, hanno dimostrato un cambiamento di direzione. Ad approvare l'adozione degli OGM, al fianco del presidente della commissione europea, ci sarà il nuovo Commissario all'Ambiente, il revisore contabile maltese John Dalli. L'ex Commissario all'Ambiente, il greco Staros Dimas, era, invece, un feroce oppositore degli OGM. Anche il governo cinese ha comunicato che potrebbe approvare una varietà di riso OGM. Prima che le cose si evolvano troppo, farebbero bene a osservare più attentamente ciò che succede negli USA, dove le colture geneticamente modificate sono tutt'altro che positive, indeed.

What is meticulously hidden by Monsanto and other companies operating in agribusiness, genetically modified crops that advertise as an alternative to conventional ones, is the fact that worldwide, to date, GM crops have been used and patented only for two reasons, the first of which is the poisonous herbicide tolerance to glyphosate, which Monsanto and others are forcing farmers to buy, if they wish to use their GM seeds. The second reason is the strength of the particular insects. Contrary to the myths promoted by agribusiness giants to meet their interests, there is no GM seeds can provide a richer harvest or least-toxic herbicide. This is simply because it would bring no profit.

The disaster of super weeds

As noted by the eminent biologist and opponent of GMOs, the SSA Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, of the 'Institute of Science in London, companies like Monsanto make seeds immune to herbicides, thanks a gene is not sensitive to glyphosate, which encodes the enzyme dall'erbicida hit. The enzyme is derived from a soil bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The immunity to insects is due to one or more toxins resulting from the soil bacterium BT (Bacillus thuringiensis). The United States began large-scale cultivation of GM crops, particularly soybeans, wheat and cotton, around 1997. Today, genetically modified crops occupy between 85% and 91% of cultivated areas with the three major U.S. crops, which are just as soybean, wheat and cotton, for a total of about 70 million hectares.

According to Ho, the bomb carried by the GMO label is about to explode. After years of constant use of patented herbicide glyphosate, known as Roundup, produced by Monsanto, have developed new 'super weeds' resistant to herbicides; is the response of nature to human attempts to violate its laws. These super weeds need more herbicides.

ABC, one of the major TV channels degli USA, recentemente ha realizzato un documentario sulle ‘super erbacce’ nella rubrica “Super weeds that can’t be killed” (“Erbacce che non possono essere uccise”, ndt) [1].

Sono stati intervistati agricoltori e scienziati dell’Arkansas, che hanno parlato di campi invasi da erbacce immuni persino al glifosate. Un agricoltore ha raccontato di aver speso almeno 400.000 euro in soli tre mesi nel tentativo fallito di eliminarle.

Queste erbacce sono così resistenti che nemmeno le mietitrebbie riescono a eliminarle, e se si cerca di estirparle manualmente, gli attrezzi si rompono. Almeno 400.000 ettari di coltivazioni di soia e cotone dell’Arkansas sono stati infestati from this organic pest. Detailed information on the situation in other areas are not available, but we assume that things are more or less similar. The United States Department of Agriculture, pro-GMO and agribusiness, he lied on the actual status of U.S. crops, to hide the sad reality and prevent the outbreak of a revolt against GMOs in the country which is the main market for these products.



A variety of weeds, Amaranthus palmeri, can grow to a height of 2.4 meters, resisting the oppressive heat and long droughts and producing thousands of seeds of radici che rubano i nutrienti alle alter colture. Se lasciata incontrollata, può impossessarsi di un intero terreno in solo un anno. Alcuni agricoltori sono stati costretti ad abbandonare le loro terre. Fino ad oggi, invasioni di Amaranthus palmeri, sono state identificate non solo in Arkansas, ma anche in Georgia, Carolina del Sud, Carolina del Nord, Tennessee, Kentucky, Nuovo Messico, Mississippi e, più recentemente, in Alabama e nel Missouri, tutti paesi in cui si fa uso di colture OGM.

Gli scienziati della University of Georgia stimano che due sole piante di Amaranthus palmeri, in 6 metri di filari di cotone, sono in grado di ridurre il raccolto di almeno il 23%. Una sola erbaccia può produrre 450.000 semi [2].

The hidden toxicity of Roundup

Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the U.S. and worldwide. Patented and sold by Monsanto since the late seventies under the name Roundup, is a required part of the company's GM seeds. To have proof, just go to any gardening store, ask for and read the label carefully.

As I explained in my book "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" ("Seeds of Destruction: the secret program handling gentica", ndt), GM crops and artificial seeds have been created in the seventies, with the generous financial support of the Rockefeller Foundation, supporter of eugenics, as Monsanto Chemicals chemical companies, DuPont and Dow Chemicals. All three were involved in the scandal, the highly toxic Agent Orange, used in Vietnam in the seventies such as dioxins, the danger of which was withheld from employees, civilian and military.

The patented GM seeds they were considered an intelligent method to increase sales of their chemical compounds for agriculture, such as Roundup. Farmers must sign a contract with Monsanto, which agree to use only the pesticide Roundup. So, farmers are forced to buy seeds and glyphosate poisonous company.

At the University of Caen, France, a team led by molecular biologist Gilles-Eric Séralini conducted a study which showed that Roundup has a particular inert ingredient, the surfactant polyoxyethylene, that the human embryo, the placenta and the cells Umbilical is more deadly than the same glyphosate. Monsanto refuses to give details on the contents of Roundup than glyphosate, as a 'patented' [3].



Séralini study found that the ingredients of Roundup amplified their toxic effects on human cells, even in lower doses than those used on farms and meadows! The French team ha analizzato il Roundup a diversi gradi di concentrazione, dalle dose solitamente usate in agricoltura o nei campi, a dosi 100.000 volte più diluite rispetto al prodotto che troviamo nei negozi. I ricercatori hanno identificato un pericolo per le cellule in tutti i casi.

In un opuscolo dell’Istituto di Biotecnologia, volto a promuovere le colture OGM negli USA, in quanto “distruttrici delle erbacce”, il glifosate e il Roundup vengono pubblicizzati come “meno nocivi del sale da cucina”. In tredici anni, negli Stati Uniti, si è avuto un aumento nell’utilizzo di pesticidi di 144.000 tonnellate, mentre avrebbe dovuto diminuire, secondo quanto avevano promesso i “quattro cavalieri dell’apocalisse GMOs ". Remarkable is the increase in diseases caused by these substances.

However, after the marketing of GM seeds of Monsanto in the U.S. between 1994 and 2005 there was an increase of more than 1500% in the use of glyphosate. In the U.S., about 45,000 tons of glyphosate is used on lawns and farms each year, and in the last 13 years, has been used in more than 400,000 acres. In an interview, technical development manager for Monsanto, Rick Cole, said that the problems are manageable, advising farmers to switch crops and to use different herbicides produced by Monsanto. The company encourages a mix glyphosate with other herbicides such as 2,4-D, which is prohibited in Sweden, Denmark and Norway, as related to cancer and other reproductive harm and neurological systems. The 2,4-D is a component of Agent Orange produced by Monsanto and used in Vietnam in the sixties.

U.S. farmers look to organic

Farmers in the U.S. are showing increasing interest in traditional crops, not involving the use of GMOs. According to a report by the Department of Agriculture, sales of organic food rose by $ 3.6 billion in 1997 to 21 billion dollars in 2008 [4]. The market is so active that the farms are tucked their sleeves to meet the rapidly growing demand, and often even have occurred to the regular lack of organic products.

The new Conservative-Liberal coalition government of the United Kingdom intends to remove the ban on the use of GMOs in the country. John Beddington, the British government's scientific adviser, said in a recent article: "The next ten years will see the development of compounds with new features, such as tolerance to drought. Since mid-century there will be much more radical possibilities related to the characteristics of polygenic. He then went on to ensure "the cloning of animals allow immunity to diseases." I think you can also avoid commenting.

A recent study by the University of Iowa and the United States Department of Agriculture, which is registered in the productivity of farms during the three-year transition period required to switch from conventional to certified organic production, has shown the major benefits of organic farming, compared to GM crops, conventional or non-GMO. The experiment lasted four years, three of the first transition and only the fourth of farming, and it was shown that despite early productivity fell in the third year it has been equated with that of conventional crops, while partire dal quarto anno ha iniziato a crescere, sia per la coltivazione della soia, sia per quella del grano.

Ultimamente è stato pubblicato anche uno studio del'International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), risultato di tre anni di deliberazioni di 400 scienziati e rappresentanti di organizzazioni non governative, provenienti da 110 paesi di tutto il mondo. Si è giunti alla conclusione che l'agricoltura biologica su bassa scala è la soluzione migliore per la lotta alla fame, alle differenze sociali e ai disastri ambientali [5]. Come dice la Dott. ssa Ho, è necessario cambiare il modo di praticare l'agricoltura, prima che la catastrofe si diffonda in Germania, in Europa and the rest of the world [6].

References:

[1] Super weed can not be killed, ABC News, 6 October 2009. See also, Jeff Hampton, NC farmers battle herbicide-resistant weeds, The Virginian-Pilot, July 19, 2009, http://hamptonroads.com/2009/07/nc-farmers-battle-herbicideresistant-weeds

i [2 ] Caulcutt Clea, 'Superweed' explosion threatens Monsanto Heartlands, Clea Caulcutt, 19 April 2009, http://www.france24.com/en/20090418-superweed-explosion-threatens-monsanto-heartlands-genetically-modified-US-crops

[3] N. Benachour and GE. Séralini, Glyphosate Formulations Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis in Human Umbilical, Embryonic, and Placental Cells Chem. Res. Toxicol., Article DOI: 10.1021/tx800218n Publication Date (Web): December 23, 2008.

[4] Carolyn Dimitri and Lydia Oberholtzer, Marketing U.S. organic foods: recent trends from farms to consumers, USDA Economic Research Service, September 2009, http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EIB58/

[5] International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, IAASTD, 2008, http://www.agassessment.org/index.cfm?Page=Press_Materials&ItemID=11

[6] Ho MW.UK Food Standards Agency study proves organic food is better. Science in Society 44, 32-33, 2009.

F. William Engdahl è l'autore di “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation "(" Seeds of Destruction: the secret program handling gentica ", ndt).

Original title: "Genetically Manipulated Crops: The GMO Catastrophe in the USA. A Lesson for the World"

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca
Link
18.08.2010

www.comedonchisciotte for translation. org by Stefania Micucci